We are discussing the Qve Quantum Emulation of a Virtual Server, an advanced topic of emulating a virtual process within the context of a series of blogs found here: The New Virtual: Quantum Emulation
We believe that Quantum works into the theory of a ONE System, of production based enterprise. That is why we want Technologists to make a determination about the Future of Quantum and Learning programs for public education.
We believe that public education is necessary on this topic and it is the usual job of governments to organize the social assimilation surrounding the acquisition of new technology or science, similar to the space program. We take for granted that those things will happen.
It may simply be that the World Order is too complex and educational systems and other federated basis enterprise systems are organized in complex ways to develop technology so that it is under the radar without really being an economic globally assessed emerging Market.
Apparently the scientists are unhappy that government wants to clamp down on their work from being revealed in the media because government seems afraid it is too complex to be discussed in public forums. But this approach is very sloppy, will not benefit our economy and lacking in that real progressive approach to the future.
We have been attempting to cover that gap by projecting into the future what Quantum sciences and nanotechnology especially in the areas of Green Technologies could mean to our Future. We can't live in the past and must work to narrow the gap of community learning on these topics.
Gap between science and media revisited: Scientists as public communicators
The relationship between science and the public—or, more specifically, that between science and the media—has been characterized by metaphors and terms such as “distance” (1), “gap” (2), “barrier” (3), “fence” (4), “oil and water” (5), and “creative tension” (6). In their well-known study on the relationship between science and journalism, based on surveys of US scientists and journalists, Hartz and Chappell claimed in 1997 that “the distance between science and journalism threatens America’s future” (1), pointing to the political and economic implications of the science–media interface. Among the factors impeding communication, they noted that scientists and journalists were like strangers to each other, not able to understand each other’s language, and driven by different agendas. Furthermore, they pointed to negative perceptions of the general media coverage of science and technology by scientists. Their description of the science–media relationship was probably in tune with the dominant perception at the time. Leading scientists have frequently commented on the problems of the public understanding of science, and the public communication leading to these problems (7, 8). The many activities aiming to improve the science–media relationship and to explore alternative means of communicating with the public prove the almost global perception of an unsatisfactory relationship between science and the media The relationship between science and the public—or, more specifically, that between science and the media—has been characterized by metaphors and terms such as “distance” (1), “gap” (2), “barrier” (3), “fence” (4), “oil and water” (5), and “creative tension” (6). In their well-known study on the relationship between science and journalism, based on surveys of US scientists and journalists, Hartz and Chappell claimed in 1997 that “the distance between science and journalism threatens America’s future” (1), pointing to the political and economic implications of the science–media interface. Among the factors impeding communication, they noted that scientists and journalists were like strangers to each other, not able to understand each other’s language, and driven by different agendas. Furthermore, they pointed to negative perceptions of the general media coverage of science and technology by scientists. Their description of the science–media relationship was probably in tune with the dominant perception at the time. Leading scientists have frequently commented on the problems of the public understanding of science, and the public communication leading to these problems (7, 8). The many activities aiming to improve the science–media relationship and to explore alternative means of communicating with the public prove the almost global perception of an unsatisfactory relationship between science and the media
Technology for the asking: The Planar version of Quantum can deliver the complete source of Virtual Server based energy necessary to power an electric car anywhere in the world, without batteries. The Wall could pay for itself in no time, see prior blog...
Read:
Learn More Live Better, don't be a Chi-ken
Disclaimer: Blog material is presented as the basis of discussion material and is not to be construed as advice, counsel or education, and may at times be misconstrued if read in a context different than the writer's intent. No portion of this blog has been knowingly reproduced. Any resemblance to a specific company or entity is purely coincidental
