To Dream the Impossible Schema

Over the years we have dotted our "i's" and crossed our "t's" to bring you the View of Quantum Qld Energy Spectrum.  We began the task of Virtual Emulation to demonstrate design aspects of the System. 

Now we have begun to articulate Qve Branching...

We called this entry on Quantum Virtual Emulation "To Dream the Impossible Schema" because it is not any more impossible than power generation was 100 years ago.  And by articulating it we have further demonstrated that many steps can get us to the Stem Goals, and milestones for projects that will eventually accomplish this.

Comments made recently in the Media also made us point out that Quantum Agile and Adaptive Production does alter machines so that they do not break down, do not require replacement or insurance and will not require adaptation due to changes in technology because of the way they are built.  Recently in the news people claimed that machines are better than people, but they presently have the same requirements.

In addition, the META State delivery of these virtual machines requires an internal workforce to automate and adapt as well as redefine new requirements on a scale of realism.

Human Intelligences along with Machine Intelligences are partners for years to come. 

See our other comments here: www.linkedin.com/hp/update/6212779599470874624

OA/s

TOPIC	TITLE
I. Distributive Power Concepts: Unified Theory and Quonics	DPC Features
DPC Features	Delving into the Theory of QLD and Power Intellige...
	Unique Concepts of the Qve Cube
Quonics and the Unified Theory explained as a Feature	Measuring the Qve Cube for Conversion
of Power Intelligent Quantum Science; Photosynthesis and Green Technology	Outcomes in Qve Cube Production
II. Virtual City: Expanding the Virtual Footprint	VCE Features
VCE Features	The Concept of the Virtual City in a META State
	Engineering the Gap, Virtual Cloud Transformation
Time and Motion Tensors and Mathematical Knots, Virtual Machines commutative properties and convergence in QLD Schema; Branching from Pascal	The Transmutational Advantage of the Mayan Theorem...
	Expanding the Virtual Footprint in Qve
III. Virtual Glass and the Commutative Lens	VGL Features
VGL Features	Qve Virtual Glass: a Transform from Break the Glas...
	Qve Virtual Glass: Changing the Shape of Things to...
Scalar building, Properties of Virtual Glasses, QLD Schema revisited	Qve Virtual Glass: The Power to Remake Tomorrow
Triangulation of Space-Time Properties, Timeline Branching and VRD
IV. Time and Engineering the Manifold: Virtual Delivery Systems	MDS Features
MDS Features	Manifold Delivery in Qve
	Game Theory in Qve ONE
What do Gates and Portals do; Problems of distributive systems in Time	The Imputed Model of PI Ano
How might timelines exist in a Qve application.	Managing the Adaptive Cycles of Qve
	Completing Manifold Processes in Qve
V. Production: 1D, 2D, 3D, 4D, 5D, 6D, 7D, 8D? Yes, 8D	PDS Features described
PDS Features described	PDS: What are the 8D's of Qve Production?
	PDS Study of Motions in Time Related Conditions
	The Strategic Use of Content in Qve Productions
VI. Encryption: Maps, Models and Mirrors	EMS Features
EMS Features	Tales of the Encryption and Lies of the Lattice
	Asset Capitalization in Projects
Where is the mirror and how is it used	Matrix Repackaged
Best practice idea about encryption	Quantum Remade
Speed and Matrix definitions
VII. Examples: Quantum Applications Now and Future	ALL FEATURE LABELS
ALL FEATURE LABELS	Securitization in Qve
	We are the Imagine Nation...building in Qve
	Content Management in Qve
	An example... more to follow in QVE
Scoping Requirements	ALL SCOPE REQ. LABELS
Srsum	SRsum: Scope Requirements Summary
SROT	SROT: Other: Branching and Virtualization
SRMM	SRMM: Maps and Models
SRQEM	Quantum Cube and SRQEM QLD Energy Machine
SRGEN	Time and Maps: Scoping Requirements

These topics were completed from our research on 12/27/2016

Read: Project Authority vs. Topological Authority in Quantum Design

Find out what we do best...visit

www.brijconsulting.com

Disclaimer: Blog material is presented as the basis of discussion material and is not to be construed as advice, counsel or education, and may at times be misconstrued if read in a context different than the writer's intent. No portion of this blog has been knowingly reproduced. Any resemblance to a specific company or entity is purely coincidental

Project Authority vs. Topological Authority in Quantum Design

We want to start out by mentioning our modeling in Quantum Theory is concerned with what is more likely to be considered a Topological Prototyping method and not:

1.  a fully developed Quantum case
2.  an approved Design Methodology
3.  an Authorized Project in Metaphysical Design Spectrum

We believe that Quantum is in its infancy and so we suggest that demonstrating aspects of the design are worth bringing to industry and saying:  see what could be done.

But we wanted to call some things to our readers attention before we move on:
1.  What will declare Quantum Building Projects as legitimate
2.  What problems we face with the design spectrum (starting points...)
3.  What constitutes legitimate authority

Quantum Design can not proceed without a valid architecture and systems frame and etc..  These things are arranged by the tacit approval of the owner of the universe.

We have been led to do this research upon the advice that such approval would be forthcoming.

Further, the designated space for such building must be authorized, conditioned, assigned, and made accessible.  We are not responsible for such assignments, but are more like scouts on the forefront of such frontier assembly.

So let us make a few brief points here:

1.  We would like to point to how legitimate authority builds
2.  We would like to point to how scope really needs to be well defined

We started by looking at how the United States was defined over a period of twenty years.  It did not start all in one day.  It came about with the idea of ONE and this was grasped by the phrase "E Pluribus Unum" which developed synergy by virtue of its separate parts becoming integrated by design.  It was an original and intelligent design that seemed to descend into the minds of the agents of the this experiment called America.  With this experience in mind we'd like to point out:

1.  Quantum design by virtue of its impact and requirements is a ONE world design
2.   Legitimacy comes from a higher authority

Po·ten·tial

ADJECTIVE

1. having or showing the capacity to become or develop into something in the future:

   "a two-pronged campaign to woo potential customers"

   synonyms: possible · likely · prospective · future · probable · latent ·

   [more]

   
   

   inherent · undeveloped

NOUN

1. latent qualities or abilities that may be developed and lead to future success or usefulness:

   "a young broadcaster with great potential" ·

   [more]

   "the potentials of the technology were never wholly controllable"

   synonyms: possibilities · potentiality · prospects · promise ·

   [more]

   
   

   capability · capacity

   • (potential for/to do something)
     the possibility of something happening or of someone doing something in the future:
     "the crane operator's clear view reduces the potential for accidents" ·

     [more]

     "pesticides with the potential to cause cancer"
2. physics

   the quantity determining the energy of mass in a gravitational field or of charge in an electric field.

In view of the idea of POTENTIAL we suggest that this string based design would be based upon the potential of QLD Energy particle string daisy rho configuration of electrons moving in a conditioned field in a META State.    This theory is not our own.

We developed some brief touch points from some recent experiential knowledge but it is not a definition of methodology nor an all encompassing list from an authoritative source, since those reading should know where to find such documents.  But we wanted to touch on some areas that should remind the reader of what kind of agents should be involved.  Further, we also wanted to note the new methods of overcoming typical project failure within an organization:

Quantum Cube is a large Taxonomy like Corporate Structure and Production Authority

The adoption of Portfolio Management (PfM) has not increased amongst organisations, but its use leads to increases in the five key performance indicators of quality, scope, budget, time, and business benefits. When implementing PfM, we have found that the three largest ways to be more successful include aligning the portfolio with the organisation’s strategy; using an enterprise Project Management Office (PMO) to manage the portfolio; and conducting monthly reviews. Organisations employing these approaches should expect to see an increased likelihood of portfolios that meet schedule, scope, quality, budget, time, and business benefits. Insights and Trends: Current Portfolio, Programme, and Project Management Practices, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) http://www.pwc.com/mx/es/industrias/proyectos-capital/archivo/2013-08-insight-trends.pdf  

In US terminology this is called the Project Management Organization and see other comments:  

68% of software projects do not meet time/cost/scope targets. Only 32% of projects were completed on time, within budget and delivered measurable business and stakeholder benefits. There are many reasons for such failures. As per a PricewaterhouseCoopers survey [3] of 1,524 organizations, inadequate project estimating and planning constitutes 30% of project failures, lack of executive sponsorship constitutes 16% and poorly defined goals and objectives constitutes 12%. It also found that using established project management approaches increased success as measured by a project's key performance indicators of quality, scope, schedule, budgets and benefits. The survey indicates that operating an established PMO is one of the top three reasons that drives successful project delivery https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_management_office

In our opinion the failure to follow the requisites of legitimate authority is the failure to recognize that the underlying substructure of organization has overtaken the superstructure of corporate governance due to the METRIC CONVENTION.

Also read:


Prosperity will come from the Quantum Cube and it starts here...

Find out what we do best...visit


www.brijconsulting.com

Disclaimer: Blog material is presented as the basis of discussion material and is not to be construed as advice, counsel or education, and may at times be misconstrued if read in a context different than the writer's intent. No portion of this blog has been knowingly reproduced. Any resemblance to a specific company or entity is purely coincidental

Prosperity will come from the Quantum Cube and it starts here...

Before we get very deep into Quantum Thinking, let's mention some ideas about Quantum that we either forgot to say, said before but not here, and develop some new ideas:

1. The New Virtual is Quantum Based and may not have atomicity as it's architecture
2. IT may be based on QLD or particle string and not QED atomic string (which we mention later.)
3. We have mentioned that Quantum has to be built with a configurator and not by vector, but that is confusing to some people.  What we mean is that you are building dimensional objects that may not be the same on every side.
4. Manifold Engineering is also a large part of the way Quantum is built because it scales the project to be built out much faster and it is a TIME based META Frame.
5. Quantum can lead to building objects that dance about in free space, and could walk across your actual desk.  Obviously, the system has to have controls about what it allows such objects to do. (Don't expect that this is anarchy, because there will always be rules.)

Quantum building will progress with the idea that the CUBE is well defined by a number of points.These points can be expressed by Pascal's Triangle (a mathematical theory) or by like models such as the Business Cube.  We express and define the business cube above like the models we have developed and worked with.  But there are other configured ideas we have modeled as well that show how the interior cube and the exterior cube relate.

(Remember that we are starting a prototype process for a virtual cube map in Quantum MetaFrame)

But to begin with our most common expression of the CUBE we will note that maps, cartography, and comprehensive models that simulate the application of what you are building are the way to begin.   Here in this Business Model we are identifying interior points of reference that demonstrate the rules for building conversion in the business.  The yellow line shows Cash flow and the orange line shows how Working Capital is Reserved.  The blue bridge between the external customer and the business brings in the cash flow while the green bridge between the business drivers and the financing of the business determine business funding.  So we can see that the interior functionality of the business cube is bridged by connectors that are very large BRANCH FACTORS that determine both access to the business, and how it operates.  We are also demonstrating that some sort of hedging is necessary to secure the external relationships that impact the business or CUBE.

One of the ways to envision working with a cube is as if you are a designer with multiple pencils that you put into the design that give you multiple VIEWS.  Each pencil helps you to define a relationship between the walls or the interior nodes that operate the CUBE.  Some of these relationships may impact the CUBE from an external source.  These relationships must be SECURED.

One of the Building Tools that we have learned about are based on the idea of Pencils and we have referred to them as Pigeon Pencils for a specific reason (later.)  We have created a specific relationship in tiers that allow us to work with the modeling of Quantum based theory to build objects that are functional in (what is to now) a hypothetical case.  In the beginning of computer language people learned to work with hypothetical languages to perform data processing tasks.

Functional Machines operate in Quantum based on the CUBE design and the idea of scalars and other dynamic ideas are based on being able to model, emulate and simulate these ideas before producing them.  In order to work with these designs we have to think in Tiers and develop with multiple functions.  This means we have to stretch our imagination beyond the VIRTUAL WALL.

We use the idea of Pigeon Pencils because we have to think about a bird dancing on different branches of our CUBE.  This becomes a dynamic with a machine and it is built on a 3 tiered frame.  We have modeled this to the extent that we have defined points and functionality within a frame and looked at the functionality in terms of the mathematical modeling of a conversion tool.

We are sharing these ideas with you because this represents the future of quantum adaptation.  We want you to be aware of this thinking and continue to build on and understand our research.  We have used the same performance design throughout our modeling so that you can follow the results.  In other words our parameters are the same throughout so that our metrics, matrix, methods and maps will match. 

We also want to explain the underlying theory better, so that we can alleviate fears that people may have of quantum and particles.  The subject begins to take shape in other blog entries we have here. Nothing was invented without the comprehensive treatment of safety features following suit, and here we can point back to the beginning of power generation when people had to learn everything from the very beginning.

Read more...

Why are Quantum Projects like Baseball?

"Ah, snatch the pebble from my hand, Grasshopper!"  We hope you will!

 Find out what we do best...visit


www.brijconsulting.com

Disclaimer: Blog material is presented as the basis of discussion material and is not to be construed as advice, counsel or education, and may at times be misconstrued if read in a context different than the writer's intent. No portion of this blog has been knowingly reproduced. Any resemblance to a specific company or entity is purely coincidental

Why are Quantum Projects like Baseball?

Let's start with a sample Access program that works with a League.  Now we admit that 25+ years ago when we first started thinking about Schemas we weren't quite ready to define the industry, but we wanted people to be aware and really give databases a good pitch.  We are data oriented and not table experts, but it's time to move up to the more advanced thinking about Quantum Projects.  And that has us stepping up into a new League.

Quantum Projects cause everyone to work from multiple Views (not just multi-tasking.)  And Multi-View is a Meta glass problem. Aside from the technical aspects of Virtual Glass, this is an amazing opportunity.

Immediately we have to begin to think in Cubes, not a screen.  It is the interrelationship of the data or tables at work within the Cube that now becomes the BIG DEAL.  And this in fact leads to an interrelationship of cubes!

To play in this League, we have to become a member of a Division.  And it also means we can't be afraid of being traded.  It needs to happen often.

Because it is only by rotation that we learn how to see projects from multiple sides and Views.  You can't be an MVP by sitting on the sidelines.

Now the ball in this concept is flat, it is a patten configuration of multiple strings or streams.

Since the technology will change we don't want to limit the view.   We simply want to say that the thinking has to start somewhere.  And we're sitting within the confederated view of Microsoft Enterprise saying, let's start here.

Quantum Projects will build everything, and they will build in a Virtual City.  In fact the whole Meta Frame and interfacing for the City has to be built as well.

We know it's a paradigm.  But every paradigm begins with mapping.   We found that you can use an existing map to devise the buildout of production in a defined meta space.  We learned this by practicing the hypothetical case of a quantum the same way we learned about computer languages in college in the 70's.

Just putting intelligent minds to work on this topic will have amazing results.

Quantum is a System, and it takes Inventors to Invent before something new is born.

Baseball started with a glove, a bat and a ball.  You've got more than that.

Get to Work!  Put your ears back to the ground and listen. There are new dynamics at work.

Three reasons why Quantum Projects are like Super Plex Baseball:

1.  You have to learn to play every position at once with a LED Tech^
2.  The ball splits and threads to other venues in a field of Teams
3.  Emulation, Simulation and Time Optimization are Push/Pull Products of Strategy

One day business and science will be on the same page
(We built our graphics with a mathematical model of QLD Energy)
^Leading Edge Dynamics

Read more...

Leading Edge Technology considers both AI and IA

 Find out what we do best...visit


www.brijconsulting.com

Disclaimer: Blog material is presented as the basis of discussion material and is not to be construed as advice, counsel or education, and may at times be misconstrued if read in a context different than the writer's intent. No portion of this blog has been knowingly reproduced. Any resemblance to a specific company or entity is purely coincidental


 

Leading Edge Technology considers both AI and IA

We have been studying the need for a number of different tools in the Flat Cloud view of Quantum. The things we write about might scare Watson but we are looking at everything as a process that moves across the scope of 21st century requirements.

First, it is our understanding that to make use of Photosynthetic Virtualization (discussed earlier) that the use of a proxy that is below the energy line and able to conform to the extreme requirements of a manifold arrangement is necessary.  We have looked at what the manifold can do, as well as timeline arrangements (not shown here.)  And we are convinced that anything can be made, adapted, changed and delivered in rapid order without the subscriber noticing.  That is a very tall order even in Quantum.

People may believe we have exceeded the bounds of reason, but they claimed that about Tesla and all of his views came to pass in a different format than he was capable of imagining.  In less than 100 years everything he was thinking about has occurred in micro formats.  But in order to redistribute and remap content, we can't claim ownership of the original package.  We have to go to another level of Build!

To work at a very small level in quantum (nanos) we have to be able to use Gear and Tools that correspond to these requirements.  This brings us to the ideas of AI and IA.

This is our blog, so if we want to use our product as an example we feel free to do so.  It's not extremely advanced but it also does not exist as an application.  It needs to become one however, and it is well mapped and documented.  Why does it need to become an application?

To really build this idea into an application it has to be resolved with AI.  It is a game theory.

Sideways Analysis does not lend itself to programming in an adaptive way.  This is why AI exists.

In addition to needing an application to build out interpolated projects, we need to move onto the manifold with a proxy, or simply put, an IA 6D or 7D configurable android.

In addition, our Simply Put an Equation describes the entire Quantum based virtual machine-driven configurable city as an edifice that can be driven with the micro dot. And green technologies (discussed in earlier blogs) lend themselves to this idea.

Why do we need to work with this idea of interpolating time and space?

In this example we had used the interior dimensioning product of our Scorecard theory to build out a store and an IA interface called the "Snoopy Skaters."  We had applied a manifold to meet our hypothetical deadline and worked through the problem to understand how this technology could be applied.  We did this on our small Facebook page just to test out the idea.

The "Snoopy Skaters" were an IA interface that explained the product and guided the user.  This isn't a real product it is a hypothetical example of how these interfaces could work with the product.

The Theory of this suggests that anything could be made in the Flat Cloud Technology including machines and services.  A subscriber to these configured Productions should not have a disruption of service any more than a person subscribing to a phone app should be disappointed.

This is the direction of the next millennia according to our brand of intelligence.   We want people to think along these lines and to find willing bridge partners for us to move these ideas forward.

 Quantum QLD Energy is a big enough universe for everyone.

Read next:

Why focus on Metrics? The flatter the cloud the better the composition...

Along with IA and the ability to use a proxy, tools and gear we'd like you to consider these brief concepts:

https://sway.com/aD2MYpe4PfQZgYnG  The CUBE, META Glass Phenomena

https://sway.com/I1f1yYG90vTFA0AT Digital Energy: A Daisy Rho Compilation

https://sway.com/ErFimobJ7WfAL1Ac  Varying Levels of Demand (proxies not mentioned)

 Find out what we do best...visit


www.brijconsulting.com

Disclaimer: Blog material is presented as the basis of discussion material and is not to be construed as advice, counsel or education, and may at times be misconstrued if read in a context different than the writer's intent. No portion of this blog has been knowingly reproduced. Any resemblance to a specific company or entity is purely coincidental