Gap Thinking in Qve

DPC Features VCE Features VGL Features MDS Features PDS FeaturesEMS Features ALL SCOPE REQ.  Advanced Topic Discussion Qve

Background:
We are discussing the Qve Quantum Emulation of a Virtual Server, an advanced topic of emulating a virtual process within the context of a series of blogs found here: The New Virtual: Quantum Emulation

STRENGTH IN NUMBERS...  IT's called LEVERAGE: While ROM wasn't built in a day there is a large Knowledge Gap; if bridged, would mean forward progress for everyone. Using Qve: Can we prove Intelligent Design?

I. The Gap Product: Leverage-able Components

Once upon a time in a Galaxy Far Far Away...

Very often it seems to us that everything begins with that statement.  In 1977 we ventured out into the galaxies of itinerate knowledge with a burst of enthusiasm.  Now we tend to step back with concern.

While the Knowledge Gap has closed considerably between science and fiction, the gap in our understandable concern about the future has not.  Yet the Death Star has diminished.

Not everyone thinks placing a star upon a tree is a fine decoration.  But we noticed a long time ago it was a different kind of star and a very different kind of tree.  It was in fact a foil star on a folding tree.  There are times when we need to rewrite the facts again and again, because in 1977 they made no sense. We didn't realize the importance of Brownian Motion, architectural trees and taxonomies, or matrix composition.

People who have designed systems, applications, and logical processes for companies, do not regret mapping, or remapping.  If anything the Critical Path to fulfillment of any design is frought with transitions that we have had to live with unhappily in the world of business intelligence.  The same thing is true in the scientific world.   There is a whole forest of information standing there and no way to shine the right light on any of it.

We did notice however that the study of particles and the listing of what we know and what we don't know has shortened, but we still are missing considerable facts between various partially defined scientific theories.  Do you hear what I hear?  Probably not.

Regrettably, colonial engineering places everything eons apart in separately silo'ed quanta of information.  Is it a ONE System?  It stands to reason that it could be.  We have looked at space like a giant factory of string compression and material separation. 

What no one has considered how the active state and the correct manifold would work if in a different format and producing together as a gated system.  And all this sketch list of composite ideas were bridged with a complex but well defined matrix.

II. Components:  Programmable, Measurable, Map-able, Adaptive (Intelligent Design)

• No one can own a ONE System.  And some of the things we have said may bear repeating.

It is not ONE giant loop, as we have identified various programmable capabilities in Qve that show a great deal of promise in bringing out a large and measurable quanta of information.  That information would help to define some of these missing parameters or shine more light on the overall purpose of tangent properties.

• To measure a Gap you have to be able to capture the gap and define what is within the gap.

Furthermore, we have learned that you must identify, measure and define the space within the gap and determine how to condition the field. There is an entire industry just in emulation, as AI and IA can be developed to enable research.

·         We cannot run from an elusive position.

People sometimes live by a spooky premise, this is actually an error.  There is no quantitative position for expecting to become a member of a zoo.  There is a quantitative position for placing yourself behind bars and that's ridiculous...

If we suffer some setback because we were researching the future, we would really be surprised.  We have been encouraged to research, and while various members come about and taunt us, we know that transitions come and go, and the more we learn about the purpose of the ONE System the more likely we are to come around to it in a better way, (as opposed to Rusty Bucket, or Magneto, we feel that META based materials are definable.)

There is a great deal more to learn about quantum just in terms of light and sound.  Systems and Matrix design and all of it are complex and need more tools and work done.

You can't really be too old to consider this proposition because Henry Flagler developed the city of Miami and the Flagler railroad in his 80's.   Nobody's politics were in his way. How many geniuses are sitting there with nothing good to work on?





Mapping is a first requirement of adaptation and allows for multiple strategies in system design to emerge.

III. Ownership Concepts are demonstrable

There is no possible way that particles can be used productively in this format and in this world.  There is also no possible way that anyone can learn how to produce with particles without the correct server and META based format to work with (in.)  There is no chance until the transition occurs that anyone can begin the process, but understanding about it is important.  OA/s

The odds of developing this information in a sequential and productive order, producing not only a satisfactory result but a comprehensive theory of Meta based production is more than 345000 Trillion to One, based on Dealer Odds.  This means it is highly unlikely  (impossible)that any of this is made up or even possible for a person to contrive on their own.  All of our relational information can be proven from the root basis.

There are multiple Legends at work in the cultural background, especially as concerns Flatworld Technologies.  This theory is at work developing a new Quantum based system in our estimation. Changes in the Field show adaptive technologies at work and Bridging the System with Pascal is fully capable to bring about new applications.

Time may change me
But I can't trace time
I said that time may change me
But I can't trace time

Written by David Bowie

Maybe you can... Qve

Rom wasn't built in a day...

Read:

Engineering the Gap: Adaptive Construction

Flat Cloud Engineering: End Game of Sophisticatio...

Find out what we do best...visit

www.brijconsulting.com

Learn More Live Better, don't be a Chi-ken

Disclaimer: Blog material is presented as the basis of discussion material and is not to be construed as advice, counsel or education, and may at times be misconstrued if read in a context different than the writer's intent. No portion of this blog has been knowingly reproduced. Any resemblance to a specific company or entity is purely coincidental

People have Ideas that Connect...

DPC Features VCE Features VGL Features MDS Features PDS Features

EMS Features ALL SCOPE REQ.  Advanced Topic Discussion Qve

Background:
We are discussing the Qve Quantum Emulation of a Virtual Server, an advanced topic of emulating a virtual process within the context of a series of blogs found here: The New Virtual: Quantum Emulation

Does Citizen Kane get the last word? Not if Wernher von Braun is right.  Does Emulation solve real problems?  We proved the effective use of Quantum is the use of QLD by interpolating and emulating the results. IA did not. A double factorial Proof!!

There is nothing about the past and nothing about the present that says that people are not the better computer.  In fact, Wernher Von Braun suggested it when he said:  it's the only computer mass produced by an unskilled workforce.  And more interestingly:  nature always adapts.  We always see that as an adaptation that increases functionality.

What makes people most valuable is that they have an intuitive skill that comes about between something called a mind and a heart.  And when they use that skill to make relational change, it can surpass anything of a computational nature.

Lately we have been communicating about the Quantum Cube.  We think it is the adaptational change of the future.  Will it change what and who we are?  It might, but we expect it to increase the leverage value of human capital.

We noticed that people can do many complex types of interpretation and inference.  In fact we noticed this before there were computers.  If we asked some managers how to increase business in order to make a transition in the company that will grow it like the above graphic suggests, they could write out a business plan with the best case scenario.  They know how to discover new ground, innovate a new product, see a better path to fulfillment, sketch some new ideas...

Given the Goal, they find a way to capture that conversion.  It takes more than one kind of intelligence to do that.  In fact, it takes a whole team.  And it starts with a kind of playbook:

Art is the means to emulate that which can not be discovered mathematically or with science

.

Discovery in emulation can generate interest in the insular value of Green Technologies.

However, thinking in Quantum is a very different set of rules and principles.  For starters, we need to see columns in two positions. And we need a registry that acquires both sets. Why should we emulate anything this complicated?  The composition of the quantum cube on a small basis is similar to the large scale organization.

When an emulation is given, you can't believe the poster, you have to dig into the content. 
For example:  How did Barry Allen ("the Flash") defeat Scudder ("the Mirror Master")?  Actually it was a combination of his idea of using Particles and Caitlin's Frosty Cap that did it...  We like the artistry of The Flash but need to remind the reader that it is QED content.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirror_Master

50	4	"The New Rogues"

Barry ends up trapped inside a mirror by Scudder. Caitlin secretly uses her emerging ice powers to help Barry free himself from his predicament (but that's not all that happened...)

Does it matter?  Yes, scientifically there are ideas in storytelling.

For example:  Citizen Kane

Don't let the entertainment value obscure the STEM facts. The bios factors are one part of the problem, but the other part which is Time and Motion is just as important.

In fact the application of the attributes of the Greek and Roman Maps are anything but adventure; it's pure programming.  Thinking through Scientific applications is challenging.

 Our Proof: The double factorial, symbolized by two exclamation marks (!!), is a quantity defined for all integer s greater than or equal to -1. For an even integer n , the double factorial is the product of all even integers less than or equal to n but greater than or equal to 2.  Here is a major corner of factorials (first sum 1166 + 589= 1755) proving Time and Motion efficiency.

Ice powers may be the Tensor Relational Grid that enables Virtual Glass. (Related to the Virtual Server...)  Virtual Glass is the way everything is made in the future.

Read:

ART has a STEM Value in Engineering


Find out what we do best...visit

www.brijconsulting.com

Learn More Live Better, don't be a Chi-ken

Disclaimer: Blog material is presented as the basis of discussion material and is not to be construed as advice, counsel or education, and may at times be misconstrued if read in a context different than the writer's intent. No portion of this blog has been knowingly reproduced. Any resemblance to a specific company or entity is purely coincidental

Variable Rate Demand: Put and Call Options

Variable Rate Demand has the following disadvantages for projects:

1.  The optional value may be the bluff, and the agile target end in loss (Jack and Jill)
2.  A Predicated Delivery of an Agile Project affects Performance  (Houdini)
3.  An emulated delivery method is required for pricing (Red Riding Hood)
4.  Put and Call Markers get harder to move the weightier the project becomes (Basket)
5.  Custom Delivery should move to a Leased Production Basis if upgrades required (Lease-Buy)
6. When possible the Agile Project should be turned over to production company for Product Build
7. BIC should always be written and addressed by layers.

Rule of Thumb: Little Boy Who Lives in the Lane (Put Basket)


The Put Method sets up a demand rate based on scale.  This demand rate works into a pool of assets and is the portfolio value of the method.  If project assets require purchase of equipment this should be included in the demand cost.  The Call Price (Sales Demand) is where the price is determined.  The requirements set up by the demand are what differentiates the price and return strategy of the Method.  Also, the Put method of layering on a scale of demand can assist in developing project layers.  (We have used a standard three levels of demand scale (1,2,3) but that is just for convenience here.  Layers (MDL) are based on the weighting of client demand.)

The Basket Method is the simplest, and is based on an aggregation of Demand or a Pool.  The Weighted Average Dollars are indicative of how the weighting changes across the type of Demand.  However, due to specialized cost and other time value considerations this method will not always work, nor can it always be applied this way in terms of resources.  Also the units may vary according to the class such as product splits, but for simplicity was not changed.  It may need to be done in layers and then applied in aggregate.



These types of projects can tax resources considerably, and that is why the Resource Planning approach would be better.  Also, some strategy needs to be applied for the other concerns related to agile projects, such as:

1. Calling the Bluff by not showing the option card which may forfeit the remainder of the project
    The client may believe creating storage is an option when it is not an option to be eliminated.
2.  Predicating delivery on the client's demands for scope changes can be the disappearing act for profit
3.  Covering all the bases in estimating satisfactory delivery should be stress tested often.
4.  As the project becomes weighted either by expanding the scope or complicating deliverables, the markers become more difficult to move and may be bottle-necked.  Simplicity should be the hallmark of this method, because you should think in terms of another phase and a different demand pool.
5.  The longer the project the more preferred becomes the lease method because the client is leasing your
facility and talent pool (resources are constrained.)

These are just some areas noted from financial observation that harm the payback.  Costing and pricing your business and portfolio can be done using modeling techniques.  But the best idea for time may be modeling the theory of the build in graphical sequential order.  This can be done along with Gantt Planning.

The Basket Method may be a good first look at your agile strategy related to variable demand.  Our Fibonacci numbers and other matrices are built into our delivery method using a formulation.  This allows us to quickly size and scale our project but there may be reasons that model could change.

We began our discussion of Variable Rate Demand: Components here:

A Game Changer

Other blog entries are available upon request

Find out what we do best...visit

www.brijconsulting.com

Disclaimer: Blog material is presented as the basis of discussion material and is not to be construed as advice, counsel or education, and may at times be misconstrued if read in a context different than the writer's intent. No portion of this blog has been knowingly reproduced. Any resemblance to a specific company or entity is purely coincidental