|
TITLE
|
CATEGORY
|
DATE
|
||
1
|
Game Simulation of
Business Requirements (incl. Data Frame Relay)
|
Business Intelligence, Conversion Solutions
|
11/16/2015
|
||
2
|
Aspects of Time Imaging
|
Business Intelligence,
Conversion Solutions
|
11/13/2015
|
||
3
|
Time About is Fair Play
|
Business Intelligence, Conversion Solutions
|
11/12/2015
|
||
4
|
The Concepts of Time Related to Varying
Levels of Demand
|
Business Intelligence,
Conversion Solutions
|
11/12/2015
|
||
5
|
Why is Demand so
Intrusive in the Corporate World?
|
Business Intelligence, Conversion Solutions
|
11/12/2015
|
||
6
|
Data: The Journey of 1000 Steps
|
Business Intelligence,
Conversion Solutions
|
11/7/2015
|
||
7
|
Scorecard in Project
Management
|
Business Intelligence, Conversion Solutions, Scorecard Approach
|
10/29/2015
|
||
8
|
Transition in Project Finance
|
Business Intelligence,
Conversion Solutions
|
10/21/2015
|
||
9
|
Sideways Analysis
|
Conversion Solutions, Scorecard Approach
|
10/14/2015
|
||
10
|
Finalizing the Project
|
Conversion Solutions,
Scorecard Approach
|
10/9/2015
|
||
11
|
Managing the Curve
|
Business Intelligence, Conversion Solutions
|
10/8/2015
|
||
12
|
Turning the Cube
|
Conversion Solutions
|
10/7/2015
|
||
13
|
Business Transition with
Scorecard Techniques
|
Conversion Solutions
|
10/4/2015
|
||
14
|
Conversion Planning
|
Conversion Solutions
|
9/26/2015
|
||
15
|
Planning in the next
Phase
|
Business Intelligence, Conversion Solutions
|
9/22/2015
|
||
16
|
Economic Justification in Comparison to
Financial Results
|
Business Intelligence,
Conversion Solutions
|
9/18/2015
|
||
17
|
Why is Project Management
Smarter?
|
Conversion Solutions
|
9/18/2015
|
||
18
|
Why Use a Scorecard?
|
Scorecard Approach
|
9/17/2015
|
||
19
|
Identifying Price Change
Metrics using Portfolio Method
|
Business Intelligence, Conversion Solutions
|
9/11/2015
|
||
20
|
Results Point to Interim Decisions in
Utilizing Metrics
|
Conversion Solutions
|
9/10/2015
|
||
21
|
Measuring Conversion on
Price Change
|
Conversion Solutions
|
9/9/2015
|
||
22
|
Funding Business Goals
|
Metric Planning
|
9/3/2015
|
||
23
|
How significant are
metrics to your business?
|
Metric Planning
|
9/3/2015
|
||
24
|
Methods of Deriving Data for Analysis
|
Metric Planning
|
8/20/2015
|
||
25
|
Data and the Dilemma of
Significance
|
Conversion Solutions
|
7/28/2015
|
Blog Content is available upon Request
www.brijconsulting.com
Other topics added to 2015 (Working with the Cube)
Imaginary Numbers: Used to derive formulas which can only be partially tested, Business Intelligence
The Right Tools for the Cube: Demand Changes Dimensions, Conversion Solutions
Time and Time Again: Virtual Content and Temporary Spaces, Business Intelligence
Data, Space and Time, Memory: The Requirement for Multi-Dimensional Tools, Projects
Topic Index (2010 through 2014 list)
Details regarding Case Study in 2015 on Demand
CASE STUDY
|
“Reviewing Pricing Analysis” Summary of Blogs for 2015
|
1. The basic price (D1), which the
Pert justification pointed out immediately, was the price most in line with the
best fit solution
|
|
Economic Justification
|
2. The Margin lost on D1 due to the lower Price
resulting in a lower payback or (scope of the project in terms of days lost) was
not a key factor in the result.
|
||
ID
|
Effect of Change in Demand
|
3. Although D1 and D2 have the same relevant range, the way
they managed their cash was slightly different. And this seemed to
produce opposing results. Taxes
increased on D2 without an offsetting economic benefit. Borrowing has the advantage of not being
taxed, with interest being tax deductible as well as capital spending.
|
|
Comments: In this Series, Data Point to Point Demand
Testing and Changes in
|
4. The Scorecard Method should include a startup project which
provides funding for recovery distributions like tax, which are part of the
normal economic cycle.
|
||
|
|||
5. Project Management has the advantage of providing for timing
of events within the lifecycle of the project, and it may extend past the
normal financial period.
|
|||
17
|
Read about: Why is
Project Management Smarter?
|
||
Project Management is
more concerned about the economics of conversion than the financial reporting.
|
[…] planning projects
in phases becomes more important. A
Gantt plan with contingency planning seems to stretch out the requirements
for documenting your strategy, but in the interim you may recover more of
your spending with thinking through the timing of events.
|
||
18
|
In order to see the
total effect of all project or segment performance results the Scorecard+ can
be used to report on all activities and funding of the business. Scorecard results may need to be adjusted
to better explain funding sources and conversion outcomes based on events or
sources of distributive funds.
Scorecard+ is long term planning tool used to monitor and simulate
(forecast) future results. But as an interim tool it reminded us that we had
not spent the capital spending provision.
|
||
19
|
While the Portfolio
Method extends the data to the end cycle, Scorecard helps to identify the key
metrics that position the business for better results. Pert and Portfolio can
give back two different results and it is an interesting comparison to find
out why. (The Portfolio points to the
end project result of conversion, but the PERT metrics are measured directly
to the end date. The Financial metrics
stop at the financial end date and need to be analyzed by creating the
scenario that derives the best result.)
|
||
20
|
By seeing the affect
that changes would have on the business elements we can make decisions to
offset these obstacles with internal initiatives that reach strategic goals
with timing that makes a difference. The ability to stratify and direct
change can make a difference in the outcome.
|
||
21
|
It may not be
necessary to go to great lengths to prove your data is in perfect correlation
to your pricing relationship, but studying the effect of the data on
conversion is important. And having a perfect case strategy is
worthwhile for a number of issues:
|
||
1. Contract changes
|
|||
2. Transfer pricing
|
|||
3. Hedge relationship
|
|||
4. Production or
Project Lag
|
|||
22
|
If we stratified your
business based on a series of projected project outcomes, we would hope to
see growth within that series. By treating your business like a project
portfolio, the spending of cash and the funding of activities is streamlined
so that you produce an anticipated return. In the depiction above a
Simulated period shows a peak of growth expected from utilizing funds
effectively.
|
||
23
|
We have researched the
effect of metrics on the production planning of a business portfolio for
long-term projects. What we discovered was greater control on metrics
was a product of scope management. Scope is always timeline related,
and business does a better job of overall management no matter what business
you are in, when time management creates effective utilization
|
||
24
|
What purpose is there
in stratifying data on the basis of timing? (some points)
|
||
1. Hedging comparison
to underlying
|
|||
2. Competitive pricing
analysis
|
|||
3. Funding
requirements
|
|||
4. Price loss analysis
|
|||
5. Measuring the
success of business initiatives
|
|||
6. Timing issues
related to borrowing and revenue recognition
|
|||
7. Sizing requirements
|
|||
8. Reporting on
segment activities or growth
|
|||
In the analysis a
$1 change in price results in a 30 day change in the timing of business
investment or funding.
|
|||
25
|
Read about Data Structures
|
Having the data
definition you need to succeed is a major step. Creating a Scorecard and Portfolio are part
of creating a conversion data set.
|