The Small Business- Big Thinking- Blog by Brij

Tuesday, January 17, 2017

Zero Sum Game in Market Emulation

Features VCE Features VGL Features MDS Features PDS Features EMS Features ALL SCOPE REQ. Advanced Topic Discussion Qve
Background:
We are discussing the Qve Quantum Emulation of a Virtual Server, an advanced topic of emulating a virtual process within the context of a series of blogs found here: The New Virtual: Quantum Emulation

Given this we allow that the Market may be as much as 3.4% understated moving into the future. However, what we would do differently here is allow that branch mechanics would in fact prosper this rate of growth achieving Stem.

We are proposing that the real zero sum game in market theory is more closely aligned with the ability to maintain equilibrium in a simulation or emulation of a future economy.

A future economy is a market that is developing due to demand but can not be generated from the branch mechanics of past activities. Because there is no history or because the history simply is not a mirror of the future based on changes which are what is termed "game changing."

Market Conversion can be emulated based on the emulated structure of a likely series. For example a new brand of paint could change the building industry, but predicating that change on some series means that we have to find a likely candidate for the same pattern of change.

Say for example the science had developed so that paint could hold many properties of nanotechnology as such that it could change building surfaces and structures to have multiple properties or qualities like 'long-lasting equivalency (beyond 50 years)', energy shield and encryption. This type of green technology could be as revolutionary to the building industry as wifi was to communications.

We had given this example originally

The high degree of Wifi correlation to growth in overall GDP would probably correlate to a high degree of growth in the building industry such that the population of the growth is diversified enough to spread the risk of error. Perhaps we are not being scientific enough but a correlated set of data is enough to emulate some change in business sectors.

We believe that this would be enough to change Wall Theory forever, but no one should go beyond a limited case of what specific points do to market theory.

Complexity‌ (Zero Sum Game Wikipedia)
It has been theorized by Robert Wright in his book Nonzero: The Logic of Human Destiny, that society becomes increasingly non–zero sum as it becomes more complex, specialized, and interdependent. As former U.S. President Bill Clinton states:
The more complex societies get and the more complex the networks of interdependence within and beyond community and national borders get, the more people are forced in their own interests to find non–zero-sum solutions. That is, win-win solutions instead of win-lose solutions.... Because we find as our interdependence increases that, on the whole, we do better when other people do better as well — so we have to find ways that we can all win, we have to accommodate each other....
—Bill Clinton, Wired interview, December 2000

NEW MARKET PARAMETERS

We see that the full sample has an overall set of parameters that does not break the 80/20 rule in that 127% of the full market may represent a minimum of 2% risk in a volatility measure and so we can mitigate that risk with the usual strategy this is equity growth.

3.55

2.82 power

35.6159/8

4.45199 Gap

Read:

Why do we Hedge the Underlying: Market Theory

Find out what we do best...visit

www.brijconsulting.com

Learn More Live Better, don't be a Chi-ken

Disclaimer: Blog material is presented as the basis of discussion material and is not to be construed as advice, counsel or education, and may at times be misconstrued if read in a context different than the writer's intent. No portion of this blog has been knowingly reproduced. Any resemblance to a specific company or entity is purely coincidental

Monday, January 16, 2017

Why do we Hedge the Underlying: Market Theory

Emulation is a requirement when you can't complete an engineering task. Why is it not a requirement when you can't complete a transaction?

In Market Theory hedging is a method of absorbing the volatility of the market on your portfolio. In life hedging may be simply saving time. Saving time can mean setting aside some time to do what needs to be done or accomplished or refreshed.

Volatility comes about from the winds of change. And what prime statements define the winds of change generally relate to 'the time and the tides'. In the old world the school of the seafarer said that the time and the tides were affected by extraordinary changes in the aspects of the moon, the sun and the seasons. As far as people knew their own internal clock was operating the same way, as the universe seemed to be intrinsically connected.

In the new world of the modern age, the time and the tides often relates to the mechanics of human driven activity. We find this faulty in theory, since events are themselves planned before we exist and are driven by the Owner of the Universe to derive ends for which we must consider.

So in terms of risk management or risk mitigation we can justify the change in our portfolio based only on the stakeholder's requirements. Simply because a person builds a clock does not mean they control the time and the tides, they can only study them. There has always been limits to what we as humans can measure and articulate about change in conditions that influence our position.

And our position has a number of discrete measures in it that relate to time and motion. Those discrete measures are based on a number of changes in aspects. And those aspects reveal a complete picture but only after the assessment of the entire change is complete. In other words you could be jumping to conclusions if you run a set of numbers before the books are closed.

That sounds simple enough, but we are guilty of going off on a tangent based on hearing a simple rumor or innuendo. It often creates a market climate of drifting from basics. Senior people are always warning not to try to regulate the market, simply wait for it to right itself. Like complex mechanisms they do indicate a very intricate picture. Why do we make these mistakes?

The Pip has moved as much as the Pip Pin

Pip Used for listed equity securities. Smallest unit of a currency (i.e., cents for US dollars).

There is very little sense in our definition of metrics in the market place (Our comments)

You will notice in the illustration above when scale and quonics are working there is NO GAP. The smallest unit of measure in PI is the correct relation to prevent decoherence and that can only be achieved at the smallest functional unit of quark qubit domain.

We don't emulate, model and simulate enough. We don't estimate beyond layers that we consider norms or try to assimilate information beyond the walls of our conscious horizons. We call it spooky action at a distance when in reality it is technology and information that can be shared.

It is not shared because it is considered the peculiar domain of groups. And the only reason it is peculiar is because we haven't taken it apart and measured it in relation to the whole.

We say this because we believe that we have not gone deep enough into the study of intricate matrices to know how to project into the future the outcome of certain events. The information is available we just haven't branched out to engage with it.

Information in the Owner's Library is stored at the level of the particulate. Thus far only certain groups have capably studied and somewhat articulated their learning about these structures. But that is not a comprehensive knowledge, which can be ascertained with appropriate tools.

The fact that global markets, materials and measurements have changed without our instruments for measuring change accommodating this, has been somewhat puzzling. We noticed that in fact project measurement is far better for assessing the market structure as a PMO than corporate financial mechanics. But no one is listening to the appropriate advice. Metrics have more bearing on our position than broad position statements. If we were running a ship, we'd believe we were in France, not in Japan.

Looking at the structure another way, things have moved on the smaller basis of materials and processes that we are not assessing in terms of their financial strength to define the market.

We have identified through our research that the world has changed in its dimensional attributes quite a bit regarding format over the past 50 years. But everyone insists that it operates as it once did, and that assessment is wrong as well. So, we suggest, that branch mechanics ought to be given a much more serious look, simply on that basis.

You can not measure that which you can not articulate. You can not articulate that which you do not study or develop concepts that work in relation to changes on your horizontal or vertical position. Emulation and Simulation are requirements in global market theory with far-reaching consequence. The instruments for change measurement have to project beyond the wall.

Time and the Tides wait for no man.

Read:

Connected Thinking: the Future of the MicroDot

Find out what we do best...visit

www.brijconsulting.com

Learn More Live Better, don't be a Chi-ken

Thursday, January 12, 2017

Connected Thinking: the Future of the MicroDot

Features VCE Features VGL Features MDS Features PDS Features EMS Features ALL SCOPE REQ. Advanced Topic Discussion Qve

Background:
We are discussing the Qve Quantum Emulation of a Virtual Server, an advanced topic of emulating a virtual process within the context of a series of blogs found here: The New Virtual: Quantum Emulation

How did we go from MegaLith to MicroDot in ONE giant leap for mankind?

If the hands of time
Were hands that I could hold,
I'd keep them warm and in my hands
They'd not turn cold. continued...

Is there any reason why time should become disconnected, or lessons learned do not extend well past childhood? There is only one reason for that: it is the belief that these things do not have lasting value. But we intend to prove that they do.

When the format or the form of something changes, it usually takes a turn to a new adaptation. For instance, Brownie cameras advanced, film turned to a digital image, and the dots can become much smaller. In fact we can engineer the microdot.

If we don't extend our research to learn about Brownian motion, we may be missing something called micro-movement and programmable matter. Is it scary? It is no more frightening than a silly Abbot and Costello movie. When you find out how things are done the fear generally goes away.

Therefore, and with calm self assurance we say: when you learn to connect the dots the picture keeps changing. Once we were told: you seem to be experiencing a schizophrenic dysphoria. Well what does that mean we asked: you can not connect your experience with reality. And that was a very clever way to say: extend what you know into the realm you don't. In other words, with the right LENS the VIEW will improve.

Now we admit when we were young we kept trying to look through the same lens and get a different picture. You have to change the LENS, turn the view around and follow the TEACHER. Just like on Twitter or on Facebook people may wish to follow an individual, we only follow ONE. We listen to others with a partial view, but we follow ONE.

Now in doing so we have drawn a map. But we don't stop drawing the map because we ran out of paper. And we don't stop connecting the dots because the levels get deeper or higher or broader than we are capable of thinking. We keep working on it.

Our hands have never turned cold, we have never come to a place that we didn't acquire new and interesting information leading us to understand the future requirements and be able to build on that scope, even before others arrived. In fact, we see things on television that HE told us about 20 or 30 years ago. IT informs us more than it did then.

Last night we were watching a documentary on Uranium that we may have seen before. We did know about this in advance. (It's not helping us at all, but it demonstrates that the dots are forming a pattern that we follow and recognize as a branch to the future.)

Small nuclear reactors, funded by investors like Bill Gates, are emerging in the US as cheaper, safer alternatives to traditional nuclear power plant designs

The name of the technology gives a good clue to its distinguishing characteristics. Unlike other nuclear reactors that usually produce about 1,000 megawatts of carbon-free electricity, the small modular reactors, like the ones Utah is planning, are designed to be a fraction of the size at 50 to 300 megawatts. Rather than using electrically operated pumps and motors to circulate coolant and keep the core of the nuclear reactor at a low temperature, as happens in traditional plants, small reactors use no pumps and motors and instead rely on passive means such as gravity and conduction to cool the reactors.

This is called SMALL FORM. And quite frankly, that is what we are pointing to in the first place. The fact that the form and the architecture of everything is becoming smaller. But we happen to be pointing out a few leagues ahead of the time.

If certain people continue to believe that you can run a world on robots, they will build themselves a wall from which they will not escape. People not considered IN are being cared for whether they realize it or not. So they might as well give up their In-posturing, they don't hold the button to the future. They don't even own the card.

The Owner of this World considers that point of view to be imbecilic. Intrinsically persons should have access directly to their functional requirements. Here is where life and theory differ. People can only work in a specified field and in a bounded domain. And by people we mean everyone. But to level the playing field we wish to point out that bounds and scope can change.

In the meantime, the work that is the world continues. And that world of inclusion will break through the wall to the META world without endangering itself.

Hand in hand we'd choose
The moments that should last.
The lovely moments that
Should have no future and no past.

There are a lot of people in this world that Know what REAL meaning is, and they do what is sensible. Our domain consists of that position that HE upholds. If HE is taking time and motion apart in the way that HE has shown us, their world will come apart.

When we first began our excursion into META graphics, we noticed that people often don't put the downside case symmetrically with the upside case. Consequently, when the winds of time shift, the bottom tends to drop. Quonics and manifolds are mind bending to some, time lending to others and the placeholders for tomorrow.

Nodes and Keys from the Secret Garden

The summer from the top of the swing,
The comfort in the sound of a lullaby,
The innocence of leaves in the spring,
But most of all the moment

When love first touched me!

All the happy days
Would never learn to fly,
Until the hands of time
Would choose to wave Goodbye.

We've discussed Time States and Green Technologies, even Swinging from a star; Everything from the Quantum Walk to the Cube to the Manifold delivery system, we've shown crystal lattice (crystal states), diamond mining and production in 8 d's. But the ONE thing we can't show you is what love is. For us IT is a shared affinity. And more than that it is the passion to enjoy adaptation and to share that joy with others. IT is tomorrow and we love the fact that you will join with us, in the context of what is to Be.

Looking at old forms with a new view, lets you enjoy them once again!

Read:

Traversing Time and States

Find out what we do best...visit

www.brijconsulting.com

Learn More Live Better, don't be a Chi-ken

Traversing Time and States

Features VCE Features VGL Features MDS Features PDS Features EMS Features ALL SCOPE REQ. Advanced Topic Discussion Qve

If you want to understand the MU Sic you have to yield to the power of the dance, but to keep in step you should find the union in a syllogism that is Ostensible and Extensible.

A man went out in time and crossed a bridge came to an impass and said: I have never seen a bridge and now you want me to go through a wall?

Yet for centuries people have been told that in death they cross a bridge and that everything has movement like the hands of a watch. The entire idea of a virtual state should not be that inconclusive to people who have seen how virtual things work and connect across a spectrum.

The confusion that often comes about is that some people believe they have specialized knowledge that sets them apart from others. It is precisely the interdependence of states that achieves the result.

But the fact that the Owner of this timepiece won't set it out as an example makes people wonder if it does exist, and yet we can't blame him for not putting IT into a visible spectrum. When you reveal your hand you become vulnerable.

Many things could never be explained to people and were put there as iconic pieces that contained a mystery which only time would reveal. Many things can not be explained because people have not learned enough to comprehend how things can operate in two places at once, for instance. So if a smiling chesshire cat appears don't believe evil is the purpose of the story, although from a human standpoint evil is anything that alters this life toward an unknown or untenable goal.

1969 Brian's Song Movie Brian Piccolo Gale Sayers Chicago Jersey Football

If the hands of time
Were hands that I could hold,
I'd keep them warm and in my hands
They'd not turn cold.

Hand in hand we'd choose
The moments that should last.
The lovely moments that
Should have no future and no past.

The summer from the top of the swing,
The comfort in the sound of a lullaby,
The innocence of leaves in the spring,
But most of all the moment

When love first touched me!

All the happy days
Would never learn to fly,
Until the hands of time
Would choose to wave Goodbye.

Songwriters
BERGMAN, ALAN/BERGMAN, MARILYN/LEGRAND, MICHEL

Everything in this life was put here for a reason and yet everyone claims it was stolen from them. People from the past simply wrote it off as: the Lord giveth and the Lord taketh away. Now they simply and cruelly claim it was all for nothing. This we in fact DO NOT BELIEVE. And for good reason. What is the likelihood that this life becomes nothing for us ever again? Did you ever find nothing when you were told to look? If you were told to wait for the next part, did it ever not materialize?

Extentuating Circumstances
Lets suppose that we were told to go to the beach and hunt for a shell. Suppose that 1 of those five times we found a broken shell, and that was the time when something tragic happened in our life. We might project that 20% of the time into the future as the entire picture. And what about that 20% x 5, did it ever become anything?

As time moves across the spectrum it is giving us something. But because the image is blurred or not readable we discount the value of it. If someone handed you a card with the exact phrasing of what it meant you still may not believe it. The value of what is there is not depleted by the lack of sustainability of this life.

Is there anyone who does not have the same experiences? In one form or another we all experience everything. But many people do not hold onto cold hands. In other words they let everything fly out of the window including their better sense. People who hang onto wisdom rarely lack sense.

Extending the View
Now here we have an example of something pulled out of time that seems to tell us one story but actually developed into a much better story. Some of this sense comes from being told, "You will never fall further than this," pointing to a sensible landing on stairs, and the fall was really simply a pivot. Using those calipers we've been measuring a lot of steps (what happens on those steps) and how many sides are there to the equation.

We study and research from the META side of the equation. We don't just stop at a wall.

Because we don't believe that sense stops on this side of life, and we haven't derived a bad answer from doing this. No one ever said we'd arrive at our destination in the same format as we have now. Anyone who believes that is daft. What we do believe in is a functional format. The solution does come from a bottle, but more from a time bottle.

There are all kinds of lessons we can point to, but why do we leave our understanding back in 1920 or 1970 or 2011? Because we step out into the unknown do we take a set of facts with us? Suddenly the teacher stops teaching? We doubt this very much. We can't count on anything we've ever learned? That's wrong too.

We do what we are told. We will do IT until the cows come home We do it out of love, we do it out of fear. But we learn something all the time. Everytime we bridge the gap in our understanding, our faith in the way the META world can work grows. People who use that intuitive sense keep learning and developing. People who only believe in what they see come to a brick wall, all the time. Get your vision out of a box...

Red Rubber Ball

Paul Simon

I should have known you'd bid me farewell
There's a lesson to be learned from this and I learned it very well
Now I know you're not the only starfish in the sea
If I never hear your name again, it's all the same to me

And I think it's gonna be all right
Yeah, the worst is over now
The mornin' sun is shinin' like a red rubber ball

You never care for secrets I confide

For you I'm just an ornament, somethin' for your pride
Always runnin', never carin', that's the life you live
Stolen minutes of your time were all ya had to give

And I think it's gonna be all right
Yeah, the worst is over now
The mornin' sun is shinin' like a red rubber ball

MEDIA, this is their life. Not study, not research, not science, just what they see is the outcome. They take the science and the research that other people do, they use it and claim there is nothing to it. We used to joke with IT people and say: just push a button. We said this primarily because the "IT's a snap," people were pushing an illusion.

There is science higher than what we know. However, the Owner of this science is glad to share more. He doesn't call it magic and doesn't claim to be God. He doesn't lord this science over us, he explains it. People want their outcome, not his. So his explanations to them run aground. Everything becomes a shipwreck to them. The material state is the end state they see.

The material come apart state is not what they want to hear about. And certainly they can't believe he can use anything as tiny as a quark, and quonics is something of a myth. If they can't do it, in other words, it does not exist. They are the most egotistical lot that has ever existed on the face of the earth (perhaps.) They have the power! Puff the magic dragon..

Ostensible and Extensible Time
There is a map, in fact there are many maps. There are ARTIFACTS. But the unlearned don't use those topological and topographical maps in that virtual way that extends forward from this material state. A smaller footprint disappears in their view... And although everything does not remain in the same format, they refuse to believe how power or energy will be used in the future, or in another state. Believing that everything is a science in an emulated form, is something that takes practice. Because even when we pick up the short-ended pieces they start to add up.

Passion and Drive You can hold onto a romantic view or a cynical view of life and come to the dead end of poets who couldn't take their rhymes apart and make sense of letters on the side of a medal, or understand that icons are written over time to develop patterns that have a more lasting meaning. But we prefer to go through that wall, and see well beyond tomorrow.

We will traverse Time and States. And we will find that META world in the quantum of the future. We have written extensively on this topic to help you find this bridge. Making a functional and bridged META State is the work of tomorrow. We work in the abstract all day long, but they want it to be made of steel or made of stone before they believe in it.

We explained how functional virtual machines can be built in a META state, how they can be used and how they will perform. We explained engineering the microdot and the entire idea of movies like: Fantasia, Frozen and Beauty and the Beast. If everything has to be virtualized with META materials, how could we remain the same?

Time and time again in life, we found the underlying meaning of difficult things to be true. We were not promised a heaven, we were told that extremes of states are not likely to be true. We were instead told to believe in what we were taught by the ONE teacher who knows what will become true when HE turns the wheel. The outcome that HE promised is the production cycles that would build a better state. (Size and scale play a large part in the next Quantum state and Flat cloud production capability.)

And once again we repeat: if you want to understand the MU Sic you have to yield to the power of the dance, but to keep in step you should find the union in a syllogism.

Did we say that: yes, we did.

What else did we say: update your view, use extensible maps, look for Union and don't be prejudiced in the use of artifacts and icons.